CFP: Speculations: The Centennial Issue of Speculum

Speculations: The Centennial Issue of Speculum

January 2026

The centenary of a scholarly journal offers the opportunity to recognize, reflect on, and reimagine scholarly methods and objects, including canonicity and the discursive possibilities of scholarship; the boundaries, borders and spaces that define our disciplines; the genres and taxonomies that shape our work.

To mark the 100th anniversary of Speculum, we aim to commemorate the journal by raising questions about the methods and parameters of our study in a prospective rather than retrospective manner. What might the future of medieval studies look like? What might the place of this journal in that future be? The volume focuses on the future of the journal and the field it helps to define by inviting a wide breadth of scholarship that can collectively speculate about how we can take medieval studies into the future. But of course those living in the medieval world broadly considered speculated on their future as well. How was the future conceived in the past and what might those past reflections about the future, and about the condition of futurity generally, have to teach us as we consider recent shifts in our field and a shifting institutional context.

The format of the centennial volume will model the kind of contributions we seek: instead of 4-5 long form articles, we plan to publish 50 short essays (of approximately 3000 words each) in an attempt to represent a broader range of voices, perspectives, methodologies, and areas of study. We welcome traditional essays as well as innovative forms of research and reflection (pedagogical speculations, creative or dialogic writing, speculative history, etc.).

We invite contributions that speculate on the past and future of scholarly work in medieval studies. We particularly welcome essays that address gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity, and that use comparative and interdisciplinary methods and that address at least one of the following questions:

  • What kinds of methods and theoretical models shape our work and will orient us in the future?
  • How might we call on more inclusive and expansive understandings of the Middle Ages in light of the global turn and critical reappraisals of periodization.
  • What histories do we examine, what histories do we obscure, and what criteria will most productively guide our examination of histories in the future?
  • How have scholarly understandings of medieval historicity and temporality shaped the parameters of our inquiry, and how might we critically engage these accounts?

Proposals of 300 words should be sent to speculations@themedievalacademy.org by December 1, 2023.

 

Speculations editorial collective

Mohamad Ballan

Peggy McCracken

Cecily Hilsdale

Katherine Jansen

Sierra Lomuto

Cord J. Whitaker

 

The Medieval Academy of America | www.medievalacademy.org

 

 

CFP: Byzantine Heritage in Peril: The Safety of Archaeological Sites

Call for Papers
Session #113
Byzantine Heritage in Peril: The Safety of Archaeological Sites (Heritage, Conservation, Preservation, Non-Destructive Methodologies)
 
Organizers: Myrto Veikou (University of Patras), Joanita Vroom (University of Leiden) and Nikos Tsivikis (Institute for Mediterranean Studies, FORTH)
A special session sponsored by the Commission for Byzantine Archaeology of the Association International des Etudes Byzantines at the 29th EAA Annual Meeting, Belfast 30/8-2/9 2023.
For participation: https://www.e-a-a.org/eaa2023

For the first time the International Association of Byzantine Studies (AIEB) and its newly created Commission for Byzantine Archaeology (CBA) propose a session for the EAA Meeting. In doing so, our intention is to disseminate recent archaeological work conducted in our field and to build a broader academic and collegial environment.

Byzantine archaeology, the archaeology of the millennial Eastern Roman empire, traditionally covers a huge geographic area incorporating the Eastern Mediterranean, Southeastern Europe and the Black Sea, extending in periods westwards all the way to cover Italy and much of Northern and Eastern Africa. Nowadays, areas governed by different climate regimes, populated by different people, and regulated under different authorities represent a broad spectrum of cultures where sites are treated in various ways. In these areas, since the 19th century, versions of Byzantine archaeologies have flourished at different paces and often with contrasting aims.

In this session we aim to address modern challenges of Byzantine archaeology as a wide-spanning international field. Sites can vary from long-standing excavations initiated in the conditions of late colonialism to state-of-the-art contemporary projects reflecting meta- technological breakthroughs. Nonetheless, everywhere archaeology, including Byzantine archaeology, is confronted by extreme social conditions, sometimes exponent local growth or sudden geometric recession of state or national economies, aggressive touristic and housing development, climatic challenges and extreme weather patterns, problems in archaeological finds’ storage, resources and infrastructures for sites’ management, or even just plain old ravages of war and conflict. We call upon a broad-spanning group of specialists, involved in the excavation, study and management of Byzantine archaeological sites across the Mediterranean, Southeast Europe, the Black Sea and beyond to participate in our session and present key-aspects of these challenges and possible policies of counteracting them. The session will also accept poster presentations.

A session associated with the Commission of Byzantine Archaeology (CBA) of the International Association of Byzantine Studies (AIEB) and MERC.

CFP: Priests and their Manuscripts in the Holy Land and Sinai

Priests and their Manuscripts in the Holy Land and Sinai

Conference at the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Institute for Medieval Research, Department of Byzantine Research

8–10 November 2023

Call for Papers

Where did priests learn to read and write? What did they copy and where? How did their libraries look? What did they do with their books? Little is known about these topics, and a general overview is missing, especially if we focus on clerics active in the Holy Land and Sinai. By addressing these and related topics, this conference will aim at gaining a better understanding about the social and cultural role of priests latu sensu (preferably priests and priestmonks, but also monks, nuns, lectors, deacons, bishops) in the Holy Land and Sinai.

We invite the submission of abstracts (300 words max.) for 20-minute papers dealing with manuscripts copied, owned, and used by priests in Sinai and Palestine during the Byzantine and immediate post-Byzantine period in the languages of the Christian Orient. Contributions by historians, archaeologists, art historians, epigraphers, liturgiologists, which aim at shedding light on the social and cultural role of priests in this region and historical period are welcome as well.

Topics that that may be addressed include the following, but participants are encouraged to develop their own questions and approaches within the parameters of the conference theme:
Social context: Which sources offer information about the social role and cultural life of priests in the Holy Land and Sinai? What can we learn from them?
Priests as copyists of manuscripts: Where and how did priests learn how to read and write? What was their level of literacy? Which script styles did they use? Which techniques of book-making did they employ? How many languages did they know and write?
Priests as owners of manuscripts: Which manuscripts did priests own? What do we know about their private ‘libraries’?
Priests and their use of manuscripts: Which signs of use (including annotations, colophons, etc.) did priests leave on the manuscripts they used? Where were manuscripts used and how?

Organizer: Dr. Giulia Rossetto (Austrian Academy of Sciences)

Please send the title of your paper and an abstract (max. 300 words) to Giulia Rossetto (giulia.rossetto@oeaw.ac.at) no later than March 15, 2023. The speakers will be notified by April 15.

If selected, we can offer you reimbursement for your travel expenses (second-class) as well as pre-paid accommodation for two nights in Vienna.

This conference is organized within the framework of the project “Priests, Books and the Library at Saint Catherine’s (Sinai)” (T1192 – G25) funded by the Austrian Science Fund FWF.

 

Database of Religious History: Call for Contributions

The Database of Religious History, based at the University of British Columbia, is a digital, open access, and queryable repository of quantitative and qualitative information with the goal of covering the breadth of human religious experience. Begun in 2013, the DRH now has almost a thousand entries by qualified scholars, covering religious groups, places, and texts (the three types of polls that make up the entries in the database), but we need your help! As part of a new initiative we are attempting to expand our entries that deal with Late Antique and Medieval Christianity and Judaism, and Early Islam, as well as other contemporary religious movements in Europe, North Africa, and Western Asia. In an effort to build the database in as swift a manner as possible, and improve the quality of any analyses produced with it, the DRH is offering $300 CAD honoraria for each completed entry.

If you are a PhD candidate or above and would like to contribute an entry on any religious group, place, or text, please contact Dr. Ian Randall (irandall@mail.ubc.ca) or sign up for the database at https://religiondatabase.org/landing/get-involved and select Dr. Randall as your entry editor.

Diogenes Journal: New Deadline of March 1, 2023

CFP via Jacopo Marcon

On behalf of the general editors of the Postgraduate journal “Diogenes” from the University of Birmingham, I kindly ask you if you could please circulate the updated CFC with the new deadline (1st of March, 2023). Attached you can find the new poster and the link to the GEM page (Diogenes Journal – Gate to the Eastern Mediterranean (wordpress.com).

Diogenes Journal

Since its launch in January 2014, Diogenes is an open-access and peer-review online journal edited by the postgraduate students at the Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman, and Modern Greek Studies, University of Birmingham. This year Diogenes is expanding its editorial team to other disciplines within the College of Arts and Law and also its audience. The new refreshed Diogenes is now collaborating with the School of Theology and Religion and the Department of History of Art.

Diogenes aims to bring together postgraduate and early career researchers and provide a platform at which they can further develop their research ideas and communicate them to a general audience.

The articles published in Diogenes cover a wide range of research interests, yet they all fall under the umbrella of the often-separate fields of Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies. We look forward to any article that actively engages with any of these fields, from universities in the UK and abroad. It is published twice a year.

Therefore, indicative topics cover yet are not limited to:

  • Byzantine archaeology, material culture, art history and textual analyses
  • Ottoman history, archaeology, literature and art
  • Modern Greek history, literature, film, pop culture, and politics
  • Book Reviews in BOMGS
  • Theoretical Reflections and Methodological explorations on BOMGS

Before submitting, please consult the author manuscript guidelines (Diogenes Manuscript Guidelines)

If you have any questions regarding getting involved in Diogenes or submitting articles or reviews, please contact the editors at:

CALL FOR CONTRIBUTIONS

The editorial team is proud to announce the Call for Contributions for the 15th issue, to be published in June 2023. We look forward to receiving contributions in English by postgraduate students in Byzantine, Ottoman, and/or Modern Greek Studies in the UK and abroad, in the following forms:

Article

We welcome articles on topics of history, archaeology, anthropology, or on any other field relating to the three areas of our Centre. Contributions should be between 3,000 and 5,000 words and must include a bibliography (excepted from the word count). Articles should follow the Chicago Manual of Style and should include a 150-word abstract. It is the author’s responsibility to obtain permission in written form to use any copyrighted image.

Book Review

Reviews of between 700 and 1,000 words are welcome on any work published in the last three years in the fields of Byzantine, Ottoman, and/or Modern Greek Studies. If you are interested in contributing, please contact the general editors about the choice of book for review before submitting.

Supplementum

This section aims to present the diversity of postgraduate research activities and opportunities in Byzantine, Ottoman, and/or Modern Greek Studies. Contributions between 500 and 1,000 words are welcome. Types of contribution may include, but are not limited to, archaeological reports, thesis summaries, conference reports, workshop reports, student society introductions, notices of events, etc.

For enquiries or submission, please contact the general editors: Danielle Krikorian, Penny Mantouvalou and Jacopo Marcon at: diogenesjournal@outlook.com

The deadline for contributions for the Winter Issue is 1 March 2023. Contributors will be informed by the general editors about the status of their submission(s) within four weeks of receipt.

CFP: Interfacing with linguistic norms, 323 BCE – 1453 CE

Call for Papers: Interfacing with linguistic norms, 323 BCE – 1453 CE 

Organisers: Dr Chiara Monaco, Dr Ugo Mondini

This panel focuses on the use of linguistic norms in literature between Antiquity and the Middle Ages. From the idea of Hellenismos/Latinitas/ʿArabiyya until the development of the concept of ‘national language’, the promotion of language correctness and the imitation of canonical texts are elements of continuity in the endless compromise between norms and usage. At the same time, every literature has breakpoints in which canons are contested/complemented by new (literary and/or linguistic) models; consequently, the interfacing with norms changes.  

Our aim is to study what happens when literature interfaces with norms; the following research questions are the foundation of our reflection:  

  1. To what extent do norms influence usage and vice versa? Does the use comply with the norm always and in the same way, or not?  
  2. How is the terminology of norms shaped and how does it change throughout time?  
  3. What is the relationship between literature and the formulation of linguistic norms? And which role does the idea of literary canon play in the formulation of grammatical norms? 
  4. What happens to customary norms and their use in literature when the canon changes? What is the reaction from contemporary voices?  

The panel focuses on a period longer than Antiquity (323 BCE – 1453 CE) to understand if, when and how the use of norms changes throughout time. This allows making broader considerations on the topic, which are particularly helpful to understand 1) canonical texts, their transmission, and their reception(s); 2) how linguistic norms act in diachrony; 3) how norms shape language usages and vice versa; 4) how the relationship between norms and usage changes over time.  

The aim of this panel is to gather scholars working on norms, the reception of norms, the relationship between grammatical texts and literary/non-literary usages in different traditions, and literature within its historical context. We would be particularly glad to discuss case studies that relate norms from ancient or medieval sources to their origin from past models and their use, misuse, or rejection within literary texts, in a diachronic perspective; or case studies that stress breakpoints along with their consequences. The panel will also be the perfect occasion to reflect on how past and present scholarship has dealt with this challenging topic. Latin and Greek literature and language are the fields of expertise of both organisers; however, proposals on different languages and cultures of the broader area of antique and medieval Eurasia and Africa will be considered with great favour. In this case, chronological boundaries can be discussed with organisers, although the panel focuses on premodern era. 

Interested scholars are invited to submit abstracts of maximum 500 words by 20th February 2023 to the organisers (chiara.monaco@ugent.beugo.mondini93@gmail.com).  

We will select speakers working on different languages, epochs, and geographical areas. After the selection, we will provide the speakers with a methodological framework, which they will be asked to consider while producing their paper. This way, consistency and dialogue are assured during the panel in Coimbra.

For more details about the conference, see: https://cechfluc.wixsite.com/ccclassics2023

Society for Late Antiquity CFP, 2024 SCS

Society for Late Antiquity

SCS Chicago 4–7 January 2024

The Society for Late Antiquity is happy to announce our call for papers for the 2024 SCS meetings!

Animals provided opportunities for conceptual explication, political management, religious experimentation, Christian theology, and literary playfulness. We invite papers on the animal, the human, and/or their interactions and interrelations in the era of late antiquity.

Send questions and anonymous abstracts to Kelly Holob: kholob@uchicago.edu. Abstracts due February 6!

Full CFP available here:

https://classicalstudies.org/annual-meeting/society-late-antiquity-panel-animal-human-interactions-late-antiquity

The Medieval Black Sea Project

Call for Contributions
The Medieval Black Sea Project
Princeton University
Due date for preliminary proposals: December 15, 2022

Material Culture of the Medieval Black Sea

The Medieval Black Sea Project investigates the history and culture of the Black Sea during the Middle Ages. As part of this project, we are examining material objects produced by or transmitted by the people who inhabited the sea and the broader region between the 4th and 15th centuries. We invite researchers to contribute a short essay on a relevant object, which will be published on the Project’s website.

Our aim is to assemble case studies on objects relating to both “major” and “minor” arts, such as architecture, painting, sculpture, ceramics, manuscripts, textiles and jewelry – as well as technological evidence and medieval music and texts. These case studies will complement the Project’s seminar series (2022-2023) and conference (2023-2024) as well as the other resources published on the website. We hope in this way to ask new research questions and reveal historic patterns as well as, more generally, to raise awareness of the region’s rich history and the resources available for its study.

Each essay should be a short academic text (750 words + short bibliography) or a video (max 10 mins + bibliography) exploring the objects selected together with their histories and contexts. We attach a list of selected objects that contributors may choose from but are also open to alternatives.

Publications will be citable e-publications incorporated within a multi-media digital platform hosted by Princeton University. All are welcome to apply, including faculty, postdoctoral fellows, graduate students, undergraduate students and members of the wider community. Our Project seeks to support diversity, equity, and inclusion of researchers from all backgrounds. It will not endorse any specific political views.

Please submit preliminary proposals using the submissions form to Teresa Shawcross, Lillian Datchev, and Earnestine Qiu at medievalblackseaproject@gmail.com by December 15, 2022. This due date is for preliminary proposals and not for a completed text. If you would like to contribute but need guidance on selecting an object, feel free to reach out to us and we will work with you to identify possibilities.

The Medieval Black Sea Project

Center for Collaborative History, Princeton University

Oxford University Byzantine Society’s 25th Annual International Graduate Conference

Call for Papers for the Oxford University Byzantine Society’s 25th Annual International Graduate Conference: Passing Judgement: Distinctions, Separations, and Contradictions in Late Antiquity and Byzantium
‘Being the product of the incorporation of the fundamental structures of a society, these principles of division are common to all the agents of the society and make possible the production of a common, meaningful world, a common-sense world.’ – Pierre Bourdieu
We are pleased to announce the 25th Annual Oxford University Byzantine Society International Graduate Conference for the 24th – 25th February 2023. This important milestone marks the 25th annual conference, and we hope it serves as a fitting celebration of the society and its history. Papers are invited to approach the theme of ‘Passing Judgement: Distinctions, Separations, and Contradictions’ within the Late Antique and Byzantine world, broadly defined.
Individuals and communities in the Late Antique and Byzantine world constantly sought to set the limits on the world around them. They distinguished one thing from another, separated physical and conceptual phenomena, and in doing so amended or contradicted previous (and contemporary) distinctions and separations. This conference seeks to investigate the dynamics of how perceptions of difference functioned, as well as exploring the fallibilities of these perceptions. Over a thousand-year period, peoples’ approaches to one another, their neighbours, the built environment, and the metaphysical worlds all drew from a rich tradition of Roman, Hellenic, and Christian pasts, yet constantly interpreted through contemporary eyes. Their imperial tradition was an inheritance of Augustus and Constantine, the topography reflected that described by Homer, and their churches were those preached to by the apostles. This could convey a sense of timelessness, but the people beneath the surface were more mutable and did not always represent their historical predecessors. How then, did the interpretations of authorities and traditions to which these people belonged, develop? Individuals and communities sought the distinctions that defined their contemporary world from authorities, yet their evolution in judgement and practice was an active, ongoing process of negotiation. If an ancient ethnographer delineated a community or object a millennia ago through negative characteristics, how valid was the later Byzantine invocation of this to their own society, and how accepted?
This conference seeks to draw together papers which explore these distinctions, separations, and contradictions. These can be viewed through a diachronic or a synchronic lens, that is to say, papers might address the Byzantine and Late Antique worlds’ shifting integration and acceptance of peoples, places, or traditions which were considered (by themselves or others) at times ‘Roman’ and then subsequently otherised or even re-embraced. Otherwise, they might address a case study of how a particular individual or community sought to demarcate between in-group and out-group. Therefore, contributors might address how these boundaries changed over time, developing alongside contemporary mentalities and demands. We also seek papers which explore the models and authorities used to make such demarcations – and the ways in which these were interpreted – both within a literary and a social context (or indeed, in the intersections between the two).
In literary settings, papers might investigate the straddling of multiple identities by an individual, and the management of consequent boundaries or contradictions. Contributors might highlight a firmer yet perhaps inherently contradictory narrative presented within a work. In these distinct contexts, we encounter a presumption of distinctions that are at once generally agreed upon yet also surprisingly idiosyncratic and non-representative; and the usage of these allows us to gauge the perspectives or agenda of an author. The creation, maintenance, or rejection of distinctions are of particular importance in genres that pit one perspective against that of another such as commentaries, correspondence, encomia, ekphrasis, poetry, ethnography, geography. Moreover, distinctions and divisions are inherent when the author contends with religious controversy or discusses tendentious social or cultural phenomena; and an individual’s understanding of the divisions between in- and out-group could produce wide variations in tolerance. Most critically, we seek to investigate the recognition that distinctions assumed by one author, can differ from others and evolve over time. In the fluidity of distinguishing and separating , we often find that the things which we think define us all can so often quickly collapse when tested.
The framework of distinctions and separations (and the ambiguities present within) is widely applicable, and novel and imaginative approaches to these ideas is strongly encouraged.
The Oxford University Byzantine Society seeks papers from a broad range of themes within Late Antique and Byzantine Studies, including but not limited to:
Distinctions, separations, and contradictions in identity; e.g., social, ethnocultural, or geographical (from the perspective of the identity group itself or externally). Case studies or development across time.Ethnic and racial studies in Late Antique, Byzantine, and post-Byzantine contexts (e.g., ethnogenesis, interactionism, ethnomethodology etc.)Discussions of social class or gender within the Late Antique and Byzantine worlds.Political and (post-)imperial perspectives, particularly regarding marginalised or marginal groups or ‘subject peoples.’ Encounters with the foreign or religious ‘other,’ and how this othering takes place.The creation and development of divisions in a wide range of social or religious contexts (ingroup and outgroup, correct and incorrect practice, believer, and nonbeliever).
Distinctions marked within literary sub-genres, e.g., epistolography, hagiography etc.The use of classical or patristic authorities in Late Antique and Byzantine contexts, and how these were interpreted (with a focus on contradictions). Distinctions and contradictions in the creation of an authorial viewpoint.Religious division and union.Separations between correct and incorrect belief and practice (legislative, religious, and political). Physical and mental separations in the built environment. Social and spatial perspectives on the creation and maintenance of distinctions.Marking distinctions in time, liminal moments (historical and in contemporary academic discussion of Byzantium). The creation, maintenance, and challenging of symbolic boundaries (religious, social, cultural). Conversion as a crossing of boundaries.
Please send an abstract of no more than 250 words, with a short academic biography written in the third person, to the Oxford University Byzantine Society at byzantine.society@gmail.com by Thursday 1st December 2022. Papers should be twenty minutes in length and may be delivered in English or French. As with previous conferences, selected papers will be published in an edited volume, peer-reviewed by specialists in the field. Submissions should aim to be as close to the theme as possible in their abstract and paper, especially if they wish to be considered for inclusion in the edited volume. Nevertheless, all submissions are warmly invited. The conference will have a hybrid format, with papers delivered at the Oxford University History Faculty and livestreamed for a remote audience. Accepted speakers should expect to participate in person.

© 2024 Byzantine Studies Association of North America, Inc. (BSANA) . All Rights Reserved.